Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07913 12
Original file (07913 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SIN
Docket No: 07913-12
17 October 2012

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Ref: fay 106 U.8.8. Labs

 

 

 

Encl:

—

1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation
“condition, not a disability” and “RE-3G" (condition (not a
physical disability) interfering with performance of duty)
reentry code be changed. By implication, he requested that his
Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “HFV”
(condition, not a disability) to “JFF"” (Secretarial Authority).
Additionally, he requested a waiver of recoupment of his
Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) that the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service is recouping.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins and Hotopp and Ms.
Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 10 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the limited corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active Guty on 21 September 2001. On 31 January 2011, he was
disqualified from submarine duty due to being diagnosed with a
major depressive disorder, which was treated with psychotropic
medication. On 18 May 2010, medical personnel submitted a
recommendation that he be disqualified from the submarine nuclear
field duty. That recommendation was forwarded and the Commander,
Navy Personnel Command (PERS-403) directed his submariner
disqualification, effective 31 January 2011. At that time he was
forced into a rate conversion. On 9 May 2011, his request for a
rate conversion was disapproved and he was recommended for
separation. Subsequently, he was notified of the proposed action
for an administrative separation due to the diagnosed major
depressive disorder. He waived his rights to consult counsel,
submit a statement or have his case heard by an administrative
discharge board (ADB). On 30 June 2011, his commanding officer
directed his separation. He was honorably discharged on 30 June
2011 and assigned an RE-3G reentry code.

 

 

f. Separation by reason of 4 diagnosed disorder is not a
condition, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
(DSM) and Navy directives. Petitioner's diagnosed “major
depressive disorder”, according to the DSM, is not a condition
but a disorder. His DD Form 214 should show that he was
discharged by reason of “Secretarial Authority”, issued 4 “JFF"
SPD code, and assigned an RE-1 reentry code.

CONCLUSION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the

Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
favorable action.

 

Although Petitioner was diagnosed with a major depressive
disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was
separated by reason of a “condition, not a disability”.
Consequently, the narrative reason for separation on it should be
changed to “Secretarial Authority", SPD code to “JFF" vice “HFV"
and he be assigned an “RE-1” reentry code vice “RE-3G”. If he
wishes to reenlist, re-affiliate, or be reinstated in the Navy,
he should contact the Navy Recruiting Command via his nearest
recruiting facility.

 

 

 

 

The Board is unwilling to stop the recoupment of his SRB in light
of his inability to complete his reenlistment in the nuclear

field. In this regard, it is recommended that he have the
effective date of recoupment verified with PERS-403.

Additionally, the Board found that he has not exhausted all of

his administrative remedies of submitting an SRB waiver request

to the Commander Navy Personnel Command (NPC), Navy Support 7
Facility, 701 South Courthouse Road, Room 3R180, Attn: Ms. MOR
Pitter, Arlington, VA 22204. -
In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following limited corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 30 June 2011, he was discharged by reason of “Secretarial
Authority”, issued a “JFF” SPD code, and assigned an “RE-1”
reentry code. Finally, it is recommended that he submit a
written request to PERS-403 to verify the effective date he was
disqualified from submarine nuclear duty before submitting an SRB
waiver through NPC.

 

b. That no further relief be granted.

c. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

dad. That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner’s application was received on 26 July
20412.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

 

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

cme. aa

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06099-06

    Original file (06099-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for his discharge and reenlistment code be changed. Since the error resulted in recoupment of the unearned portion of his reenlistment bonus, Petitioner’s record should be corrected, where appropriate to show that he is entitled to keep the SRB payments he received before his discharge on 31 December 2003.The Board further concludes that this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8226 14

    Original file (NR8226 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U0995 of 28 July 2014 and OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U01313 of 8 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05958-97

    Original file (05958-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552' (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, be corrected by changing the reason for discharge or, in the alternative, that the record be corrected to show that the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was not recouped. portion of my...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07447-97

    Original file (07447-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (b) SECNAVINST 7220.383 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by reinstating him to active duty, changing the reason for discharge or, in the alternative, that the record be corrected to show that the unearned portion of...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-108

    Original file (2012-108.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who was honorably discharged on March 13, 1995, after completing 6 months and 28 days of active service, asked the Board to correct the reentry code, separation code, and narrative reason for separation on his discharge form, DD 214. However, the Coast Guard has recommended that the applicant’s record be corrected to reflect a discharge due to an adjustment disorder pursuant to ALCOAST 252/09 even though the applicant was never diagnosed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10921-08

    Original file (10921-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR ‘Docket No: 10921-08 20 October ‘2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD ‘Ossi hey Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. A Sailor separated for this reason may also receive an RE-4 reenlistment code, which means that the individual is not recommended for reenlistment. Nonetheless, the Board concludes that Petitioner's narrative reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04319-12

    Original file (04319-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SUN Docket No: 04319-12 20 March 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2004-136

    Original file (2004-136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    before the Coast Guard, and I have one now with the Michigan Army National Guard even after the Coast Guard. Although the applicant requested that his record be corrected to show he was discharged by reason of hardship, the Board agrees with the Coast Guard that no evidence exists in the record that the applicant ever requested a discharge by reason of hardship prior to his discharge from the Coast Guard. of the Personnel Manual and the JFX separation code support personality disorder...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04647-07

    Original file (04647-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4647-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORM! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing his reentry code issued on 22 October 2001. With respect to his reentry code the Board notes that the RE-4 reentry code is...